Acer Chromebook 13: 1080p with Tegra K1by Jarred Walton on January 23, 2015 10:00 AM EST
Meet Acer’s Chromebook 13
The Google Chromebook has a rather interesting history, starting as an always connected device with all your data stored in the cloud and slowly but steadily transforming into a platform that can function as a full laptop replacement. That’s not to say that everything you might want to do on a modern laptop is possible, but if it can do 95% of what most users need that could very well be enough, and there are clear benefits to Chrome OS as well.
Perhaps the strongest point in favor of Chrome OS is that it is a closed ecosystem. Unless you enable developer features, you’re effectively locked in to a collection of curated apps, all available through the Chrome Web Store. That being the case, viruses and other malware are pretty much a non-issue, at least in my experience, which removes a potentially huge support headache for users and administrators.
Along with the curated ecosystem, you also store most of your files in the cloud on Google’s various services (or in another cloud, e.g. Microsoft’s OneDrive), which means if something really goes south on a Chromebook – i.e. if the hardware malfunctions and can’t be fixed, or if your Chromebook is stolen – all you need to do is get a replacement Chromebook, log in, and outside of files you may have stored locally you can pick up right where you left off. It’s a benefit that can be extremely useful in a variety of other situations as well, like school classrooms where students don’t need a personal Chromebook, or offices where Chromebooks can be shared with no real concern for ownership.
Of course storing files in the cloud is something you can do with any laptop or other electronic device, but Chromebooks are basically purpose built for this sort of use. And there are other great benefits as well, like generally improved battery life relative to similarly equipped Windows laptops, a more responsive user interface given the limited hardware resources, and of course cost. That last point is a bit less of a clear win over Windows laptops these days, as Windows 8.1 with Bing has been able to effectively match the price point of Chromebooks.
Brett recently took a look at the HP Stream 11 for example, which costs $199 (and occasionally less); it’s definitely a $200 laptop, though, with compromises in many key areas. So let’s look at the Acer Chromebook 13 specifications, and we’re primarily going to be interested in seeing how it stacks up against other Chromebooks as well as inexpensive Windows laptops.
|Acer Chromebook 13 Specifications|
|Processor||NVIDIA Tegra K1
Quad-core Cortex A15 2.1GHz
192 CUDA core GPU)
|Connectivity||1x1 dual-band 802.11ac
|Battery||4-cell 15.2V 3220mAh 48Wh|
|I/O||2 x USB 3.0
SD Card reader
|Dimensions||12.9" x 9.0" x 0.71" / 328 x 229 x 18 mm|
|Display||13.3-inch TN 1920x1080|
|Weight||3.31 lbs. / 1505g|
|Price||$300 MSRP, $250 Online|
The big differentiator with Acer’s Chromebook 13 compared to other options is the use of NVIDIA’s Tegra K1 SoC. It’s a pretty potent SoC in the tablet world, with NVIDIA’s SHIELD still placing near the top of most benchmark charts. But when we switch over to the world of laptops and Chromebooks, TK1 has a very different set of competitors. Intel’s Bay Trail chips are around, sure, but along with a few ARM-based SoCs there’s also one rather interesting competitor: Intel’s Haswell-based Celeron 2955U. That’s actually the chip used in Acer’s previous Chromebook, the C720 variants, and while it’s the lowest end Haswell chip Intel makes, as we’ll see later it can still pack a punch.
So why would Acer switch from the Celeron 2955U to the TK1? Simply put, performance isn’t the only important element with a Chromebook. Battery life is certainly another factor, and while the 2955U isn’t necessarily a power hungry chip, the TK1 definitely wins out in pure power use and thermals. That means two things: better battery life, and possibly more importantly is that the Chromebook 13 is entirely fanless. Cost is likely another contributing factor, and while the C720 sold well, it has now been replaced by an updated 11.6” Chromebook with Intel’s Celeron N2830/N2840 Bay Trail SoC.
Here’s where things get a bit interesting. There are quite a few variants of the Chromebook 13. The lowest end model comes with 2GB RAM and a 1366x768 resolution LCD at $229; there’s a model with the same LCD but 4GB RAM but it’s too expensive. The option we’re reviewing costs $20 more and upgrades the display to a 1920x1080 LCD while staying with 2GB RAM, or if you want both the LCD upgrade and 4GB RAM upgrade plus 32GB of storage, the price ends up being $289 (marked down $91 from MSRP now). The version we received use to be the most sensible option, and at $249 it’s not a bad deal, but $40 to double your RAM and storage is certainly a reasonable price.
We’d also be remiss at this stage to not point out the updates that have been made to Acer’s Chromebook line in the past month. Acer has now announced the Chromebook 15 along with the C740 and C910 education models. All of those feature Intel’s new Broadwell-U processors, so they should be even faster than the C720, and the Chromebook 15 is available with a 1080p IPS display
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
JarredWalton - Monday, January 26, 2015 - linkNo, as it's not supported on Chrome OS. I'd really like to add some better graphics/gaming benchmarks if possible, but I just don't know of any. If you have recommendations, let me know!
twotwotwo - Sunday, January 25, 2015 - linkI have one. (On it now.) The big thing I'd mention that's not here is there are glitches--session crashes if I use an external monitor for a long time, occasional reboots (maybe triggered by very low battery), and an ignorable but really odd glitch where garbage flickers up on part of the built-in LCD for one frame. GMail loads awful slowly, and Google Play Music stutters (meaning software isn't all there yet--music is smooth on my much-lower-powered phone!).
Despite all that I like it; I'm using the 4GB RAM model and running Ubuntu alongside Chrome OS via crouton just to have a local Unix shell. It's a nice cheap portable terminal first and just happens to sort of serve as a standalone computer too. Those issues make it hard for me to recommend it to most other folks, though.
sonicmerlin - Sunday, January 25, 2015 - linkWhy didn't they use a Denver CPU?
JarredWalton - Monday, January 26, 2015 - linkProbably wasn't ready in time, plus I'm not sure Denver is really all that great in the first iteration. If Denver is so awesome... why isn't it in Tegra X1? Ha.
darkich - Monday, January 26, 2015 - linkI know how ironic this will sound, but Google is horribly short sighted.
Optimized and polished Andromium-like Android (google it for more info) just kills Chrome in every single respect.
And Google just seems to fail realizing that for some reason
AceMcLoud - Tuesday, January 27, 2015 - linkJust get a MacBook Air ...
JarredWalton - Wednesday, January 28, 2015 - linkFor only five times the cost?
speculatrix - Tuesday, January 27, 2015 - linkDear Anandtech,
Please start all laptop reviews with a brief summary of the quality of the display options.
If the displays aren't reasonable quality I can quickly ignore the rest of the review.
I skimmed the first part of this review until I got to where it said the display was a poor TN, and read no further.
Hopefully others will find the review useful.
sunsetwatch - Wednesday, January 28, 2015 - linkAcer Chromebook is one of the best laptops ever released on the market. They have the most excellent specs and functions that could be of great for both business and entertainment.
zephonic - Sunday, February 8, 2015 - linkRe: the Chrome OS vs. Windows debate:
I much prefer Chromebooks over cheap Windows laptops. Less of a headache/irritant all around. I'm a Mac user, but I think Chromebooks are a better alternative to my iPad than a $500 Windows laptop. I still use my old Asus laptop for an occasional bout of C&C, but that's all.