Some Thoughts About the Lumia 1020 Camera Systemby Brian Klug on July 11, 2013 6:23 PM EST
- Posted in
- lumia 1020
Today Nokia announced their new flagship smartphone, the Lumia 1020. I’ve already posted about the announcement and details, and what it really boils down to is that the Lumia 1020 is like a better PureView 808 inside a smaller Lumia 920 chassis. In fact, a quick glance at the About page on the Lumia 1020 shows exactly how much the 1020 is the 808’s spiritual successor – it’s erroneously named the Nokia 909.
Anyhow I thought it worth writing about the imaging experience on the Lumia 1020 in some detail since that’s the most important part of the device. We’re entering this interesting new era where the best parts of smartphone and camera are coming together into something. I’ve called them connected cameras in the past, but that really only goes as far as describing the ability to use WiFi or 3G, these new devices that also work as phones are something more like a smartphone with further emphasized imaging. Think Galaxy S4 Zoom, PureView 808, and now Lumia 1020. For Nokia the trend isn’t anything new, for the rest of the mobile device landscape to be following suit, is.
Once again however, Nokia has set a new bar with the Lumia 1020 – it combines the 41 MP oversampling and lossless zoom features from the PureView 808 with Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) and WP8 from the Lumia 920 / 925 / 928 series. And it does so without making the device needlessly bulky, it’s actually thinner and lighter than the Lumia 920. When I heard that Nokia was working on getting the 41 MP profile camera I have to admit I pictured something resembling the PureView 808 with the same relatively large bulge, but just running Windows Phone. The camera region still protrudes, sure, but the extent of the protrusion isn’t nearly as big as that of the 808.
|Camera Emphasized Smartphone Comparison|
|Samsung Galaxy Camera (EK-GC100)||Nokia PureView 808||Samsung Galaxy S4 Zoom||Nokia Lumia 1020|
|CMOS Resolution||16.3 MP||41 MP||16.3 MP||41 MP|
|CMOS Format||1/2.3", 1.34µm pixels||1/1.2", 1.4µm pixels||1/2.3", 1.34µm pixels||1/1.5", 1.12µm pixels|
4.1 - 86mm (22 - 447 35mm equiv)
8.02mm (28mm 35mm equiv)
4.3 - 43mm (24-240 mm 35mm equiv)
|PureView 41 MP, BSI, 6-element optical system, xenon flash, LED, OIS (F/2.2, 25-27mm 35mm eff)|
|Display||1280 x 720 (4.8" diagonal)||640 x 360 (4.0" diagonal)||960 x 540 (4.3-inch)||1280 x 768 (4.5-inch)|
|SoC||Exynos 4412 (Cortex-A9MP4 at 1.4 GHz with Mali-400 MP4)||1.3 GHz ARM11||1.5 GHz Exynos 4212||1.5 GHz Snapdragon MSM8960|
|Storage||8 GB + microSDXC||16 GB + microSDHC||8 GB + microSDHC||32 GB|
|Video Recording||1080p30, 480p120||1080p30||1080p30||1080p30|
|OS||Android 4.1||Symbian Belle||Android 4.2||Windows Phone 8|
|Connectivity||WCDMA 21.1 850/900/1900/2100, 4G, 802.11a/b/g/n with 40 MHz channels, BT 4.0, GNSS||WCDMA 14.4 850/900/1700/1900/2100, 802.11b/g/n, BT 3.0, GPS||WCDMA 21.1 850/900/1900/2100, 4G LTE SKUs, 802.11a/b/g/n with 40 MHz channels, BT 4.0, GNSS||
Quad band edge, WCDMA 42 850/900/1900/2100
LTE bands 1,3,7,20,8
To get that thickness down, Nokia went to 1.12 micron square pixels, as opposed to the 1.4 micron pixels on the PureView 808. This results in a smaller overall sensor (from 1/1.2“ in the 808 to 1/1.5” in the 1020) which in turn lets the optical designers make a thinner system – it’s entirely physics constrained.
Lumia 1020 CMOS (left), Lens system (right)
To make up for the loss of sensitivity, Nokia moved to now-ubiquitous BSI (Back Side Illumination) pixels for the Lumia 1020. I didn’t realize it before, but the 808 used an FSI (Front Side Illumination) sensor. Nokia tells me that the result is the same level of sensitivity between the two at the sensor level, add in OIS and the Lumia 1020 will likely outperform the 808 in low light.
Left to right: Lumia 1020 Module, Module cut in half, lens, CMOS sensor
At an optical level the Lumia 1020 is equally class-leading. The 1020 moves to an F/2.2 system over the 808’s F/2.4, and is a 6-element system (5 plastic aspheric, 1 glass), with that front objective being entirely glass. Nokia claims to have improved MTF on this new system even more at the edges and resolves enough detail to accommodate those tiny 1.12 micron pixels. Nokia has also moved to a second generation of OIS for the Lumia 1020 – it still is a barrel shift, but instead of pushing the module around with electromagnets, the system now uses very small motors to counteract movements.
The Lumia 1020 also has two flashes - an LED for video and AF assist, and xenon for freezing motion and taking stills. Although I still hesitate to use direct flash on any camera, even if it’s xenon and not the hideously blue cast of a white LED, this will help the 1020 push considerably into completely dark territory where you just need some on-camera lighting to get a photo. A lot of the thickness constraints of the 808 I’m told were due to the capacitor for the xenon, the 1020 moves to a flat capacitor.
(Bottom to top: Lumia 1020, Lumia 920, PureView 808, N93, ?)
Nokia laid out the entire optical stack in the open in numerous demos and meetings at their event. The module in the 1020 is big compared even to Nokia’s previous modules. It looks positively gigantic compared to the standard sized commodity modules that come in other phones. The amount of volume that Nokia dedicates to imaging basically tells the story.
One of my big questions when I heard that 41 MP PureView tech was coming to Windows Phone was what the silicon implementation would look like, since essentially no smartphone SoCs out of box support a 41 MP sensor, certainly none of the ones Windows Phone 8 GDR2 currently supports. With the PureView 808, Nokia used a big dedicated ISP made by Broadcom to do processing. On the Lumia 1020, I was surprised to learn there is no similar dedicated ISP (although my understanding is that it was Nokia’s prerogative to include one), instead Nokia uses MSM8960 silicon for ISP. Obviously the MSM8960 is only specced for up to 20 MP camera support, Nokia’s secret sauce is making this silicon support 41 MP and the PureView features (oversampling, subsampling, lossless on the fly zoom) through collaboration with Qualcomm and rewriting the entire imaging stack themselves. I would not be surprised to learn that parts of this revised imaging solution run on Krait or Hexagon DSP inside 8960 to get around the limitations of its ISP. I suspect the Lumia 1020 includes 2 GB of LPDDR2 partly to accommodate processing those 41 MP images as well. Only with the next revision of Windows Phone (GDR3) will the platform get support for MSM8974 which out of box supports up to 55 MP cameras.
Of course the hardware side is a very interesting one, but the other half of Nokia’s PureView initiative is software features and implementation. With the Lumia 1020, Nokia has done an end-run around the Windows Phone platform by including their own third party camera application called Nokia Pro Cam that leveraging their own APIs built into the platform.
Default camera setting (left), Stock camera still exists (right)
The stock WP8 camera application is still present, it’s just not default (though you can change this under Settings for Photos + Camera). This way Nokia gets the chance to build its own much better camera UI atop Windows Phone.
Nokia Pro Cam looks like the most comprehensive mobile camera UI I’ve seen so far. Inside is full control over white balance, manual focus (macro to infinity), ISO (up to 4000), exposure time (up to 4 seconds), and exposure control. While there are other 3rd party camera apps on WP8 that expose some of this, none of them come close to the fluidity of Pro Cam, which adjusts in real time as you change sliders, has a clear reset to defaults gesture, and will highlight potentially hazardous to image quality settings changes with a yellow underline. Of course, you can optionally just leave all of this untouched and run the thing full auto. The best part is that the Lumia 920, 925, and 928 will get this awesome Nokia camera app with the Amber software update.
The analogy for the PureView 808 was that it was a 41 MP shooter that took great 5 MP pictures, this remains largely the case with the Lumia 1020 through the use of oversampling. The result is a higher resolution 5 MP image than you’d get out of a 5 MP CMOS with Bayer grid atop it.
By default, the 1020 stores a 5 MP oversampled copy with the full field of view alongside the full 34 (16:9) or 38 (4:3) MP image. Inside Windows Phone and Pro Cam (Nokia’s camera app) the two look like one image until one zooms in, and of course there’s the ability to of course change this to just store the 5 MP image.
Just like with the PureView 808 there’s also lossless zoom, which steps through progressively smaller subsampled crops of the image sensor until you reach a 1:1 5MP 3x center crop in stills, or 720p 6x crop in video (1080p is 4x). This works just like it did on the PureView 808 with a two finger zoom gesture.
Nokia used to earn a lot of kudos from me for bundling a tripod mount with the PureView 808, with the Lumia 1020 Nokia has gone a different direction by making an optional snap on camera grip and battery. The grip contains a 1020 mAh battery and well done two-stage camera button, and a tripod screw at the bottom. With the camera grip attached, the 1020 felt balanced and like a more stable shooting platform than without.
For a full walkthrough of the camera UI and features, I'd encourage you to take a look at the video I shot of Juha Alakarhu going through it, who presented on stage. I also took another video earlier in the day walking through some of it myself. It's really the only way to get an appreciation for how fluid the interface is and how much better it is than the stock WP8 camera app.
Although I wasn’t allowed to pull images from the Lumia 1020 for later review, what I did see on-device was impressive. I think it’s fair to say that once again Nokia has set basically set the bar for the rest of the smartphone imaging world – in terms of both hardware and software features. It's a step forwards from the PureView 808, and from the Lumia 920 / 925 / 928. Of course, the ultimate question is whether consumers are going to appreciate all of it and be willing to pay the premium for the Lumia 1020 over the Lumia 925 / 928 or another smartphone entirely. Although imaging quality is a big emphasis for smartphone shoppers, it isn’t the only one, and the Windows Phone 8 pill is still a big one for me and many others to swallow.
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
chadrandom - Monday, July 15, 2013 - linkIf you can't see your GS3 lag, then you either have lesser eyesight than many people (don't mean to insult you, but I'm beginning to wonder if this is a real reason that some see the lag and some don't) or you have done significant tweaking to the ROM which most consumers don't want to do, shouldn't have have to do, and certainly voided your warranty in the process.
The only Android device I have ever seen on which I could not detect any "lag" is the Nexus 4. Even the Galaxy Note 2 "lags" too much for me to consider buying it. Android's hardware requirements to meet the level of smoothness that WP8 and iOS users enjoy is confounding. The fact that a "project butter" ever even existed is evidence that Google is aware of this issue and it is a problem. I've heard many people say for the last 2 years that Android no longer suffers lag, but that is not at all the truth in my experience, and it is the reason I waited so long to switch from iOS to Android despite the clearly better services (as a Google Apps user) available in Android. There's nothing more disappointing that reading a review of a new Android device which says it's "fast", "snappy", or "smooth", only to test it and find immediately that it lags just like all of it's predecessors.
Also, I would take the position that hardware may surpass software needs, but can never surpass software wants. For example, you can run Adobe Premiere on many budget laptops today because the *needs* are met, but it will not perform the same as running it on a custom built desktop with 5-10x the horsepower. Some software may not *need* much, but it sure does *want* a lot. Android seems to be a software that wants an awful lot in my opinion.
Rick83 - Friday, July 12, 2013 - linkSo it does 16:9 and 4:3...
But the entire photo industry and education is built around 3:2 aspect ratio. Rule of thirds, print sizes, etc, etc. If you can't do 3:2, as a camera you're going to be a second class citizen, relegated to snapshots.
Can this do 3:2 and nobody mentioned it, or is it just another device for a generation that doesn't care about "legacy form factors".
Krysto - Friday, July 12, 2013 - link"When I heard that Nokia was working on getting the 41 MP profile camera I have to admit I pictured something resembling the PureView 808 with the same relatively large bulge, but just running Windows Phone"
Come on Brian, you can't be serious. When 808 launched most phones were 12mm thick - especially Nokia's phones (even in 2012, the Lumia 900 was that thick). So that means Nokia's "average thickness" was already bigger than most competitors.
Now most phones are 8mm thick, and some are even approaching 6mm in thickness. And you're telling me you're surprised that the Pureview phone went from 14mm to 10mm (discounting the camera bump on both cases)?
Please tell me that's actually not true, and you're just exaggerating. Because if it's true, then you aren't paying a lot of attention to technology trends..
Zink - Friday, July 12, 2013 - linkWithout the information that Nokia moved to a BSA sensor at a smaller pitch it is reasonable to assume they would reuse the same sized sensor again, requiring the thicker camera bulge from the 808. If Nokia wanted to go back to the sensor size of the 808 the 1020 would need to be even thicker than it is now.
Brian Klug - Friday, July 12, 2013 - linkThis. Without moving to 1.1µm it would be just as thick as the 808. Plus the round capacitor.
iamadeer - Friday, July 12, 2013 - linkBest. Article. Ever.
Thank you for making sense in a world of bullshit tech-"journalists". Thank you.
Gadgety - Friday, July 12, 2013 - linkThank you Brian, by far the best coverage of the 1020! This is the greatest camera phone with an OS liability, even though it's less of a liability than Symbian. I want one, but there's software, and functions I need that's only available for Android/iOS which makes me hesitate.
skiboysteve - Friday, July 12, 2013 - linkCan you elaborate on what you want from WP8 that it lacks? Google services is one of them for sure. I'm just curious which ones are the specific ones you need.
Brian Klug - Friday, July 12, 2013 - linkThat's exactly how I feel as well, WP8 is far more usable than Symbian, but it still is second to Android and iOS for me. Until the next version of WP (WP9?) or GDR3 with 1080p phones I really will have a hard time not keeping it as a secondary at best.
lmcd - Friday, July 12, 2013 - linkI don't see it particularly secondary if Facebook and Twitter apps meet or beat their counterparts and Microsoft starts closing the game void. What other areas are lacking?