New Single Thread Performance Champion?

Aside from rough microarchitectural performance claims, we don’t typically talk much about first-party benchmark numbers – they are unverified and we’d rather hold station until the reviews where we can talk about our own testing. There are a couple of numbers that I do want to pull out of AMD’s marketing however, if only to put some markers in the sand compared to numbers we already have.

One of the favorite benchmarks that both Intel and AMD have used over the years is Cinebench, a test scene render for Cinema4D. AMD has been promoting it with Ryzen because it holds a performance lead, whereas Intel prefers to highlight it as an example of a less-than-ideal representative workload. We use it in our test suite as only one of a number of rendering workloads, covering a large user base. From our numbers, Intel and AMD’s best processors have the following results in a single threaded test:

CineBench R20 Single Thread Score
(As Measured at AnandTech)
AnandTech uArch Process 1C Turbo Score
Intel Core i7-1185G7 Tiger Lake Intel 10nm SuperFin 4.8 GHz 595pts
Intel Core i9-10900K Comet Lake Intel 14+++ 5.3 GHz 538pts
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X Zen2 TSMC 7nm 4.7 GHz 536pts
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT Zen2 TSMC 7nm 4.7 GHz 523pts

(Note that in the single threaded test, the power limits ultimately should not apply because one core should not consume all the power of the chip. For the Tiger Lake processor, because this is a nominal 15 W TDP part with a 50 W turbo, this actually does go above the power limit with one core active, as it scores 554. As a result, the 50 W mode with a 28 W TDP was used and scores 595. This is more akin to a desktop processor anyway.)

AMD’s number for its Ryzen 9 5900X, at 4.8 GHz turbo, is 631.

CineBench R20 Single Thread Score
(As Measured by AMD)
AMD uArch Process 1C Turbo Score
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X Zen3 TSMC 7nm 4.8 GHz 631pts

Generation-on-generation, this would be a 17.8% performance increase. Over Intel’s highest performing desktop Core i9, that would be a lead of 17.3%. Over Intel’s latest generation microarchitecture, Tiger Lake, this is a 6% performance increase at the same frequency.

Whichever way you slice it, whether you consider the lead a 17% lead from desktop-to-desktop, or a 6% lead from best-to-best, one thing is clear that if this result is correct, AMD will have the single threaded performance crown.

The previous time that AMD truly held this title was over a decade ago, and ever since the company has been playing catch-up. The argument over having enough single thread performance, if these results are correct, is one that AMD can fight toe-to-toe on. Not only that, but in AMD’s marketing materials, they believe it is a clear cut winner.

Mainstream Gaming

This sort of metric also extends out to gaming, which has been a contentious issue since Ryzen enabled AMD to play in this market again. AMD’s numbers here focus on 1080p gaming for two reasons: firstly it’s an area where CPUs are more important for performance, but secondly because they cite that 1080p monitors are still the bulk of monitor sales for gamers, especially when looking at high refresh rates.

For 1080p high quality gaming, AMD is making two clear claims.

Firstly, when comparing the Ryzen 9 5900X to the Ryzen 9 3900XT, the new processor is stated to boost average frame rates anywhere from +5% up to +50%, with an average around +26%.

Secondly, when comparing the Ryzen 9 5900X to the Core i9-10900K, the new processor is stated to win by 7%, with individual benchmarks varying from a 3% loss to a 21% win.

This latter one is important, as when the Core i9-10900K was released, there as a strong marketing message that this was the best gaming CPU available on the market. Now AMD believes it can make that claim and take the crown. The important element for AMD to manage however is availability – the availability of the 10900K has been so varied that Intel quietly released the 10850K to manage expectations. If AMD can put enough Ryzen 9 5900X processors into the hands of people that want them, then Intel has a bigger step to climb to regain the title when it will reportedly launch its Rocket Lake processors in Q1 next year.


AMD’s Claims

As always, we will wait until we have the hardware on hand to form our own conclusions. These results are AMD first party tests, so the usual standards of caution apply. AMD has a strong history of making accurate claims, confirmed by our testing in recent years, but we still recommend waiting for our review.

Chipset Support

As always, AMD is keen to highlight that the new Ryzen 5000 processors are supported in currently available motherboards. Due to the long life cycle of the AM4 platform, there has been some segmentation between chipset and processor support, however AMD this time around has made it very clear when it comes to supported chipsets. AMD has split its instructions in two.

For 500 series chipset users, motherboards firmware that supports the new hardware should already be available. Users will need to ensure that a minimum AGESA version of 1.0.8.0 is installed which will ensure that the system will boot. For full support and performance, users should update to AGESA 1.1.0.0 for the best experience.

For 400 series chipset users, AMD is currently hard at work with motherboard partners to update their firmware stacks. AMD expects the first beta BIOSes with Ryzen 5000 support to be made available from January, however part of this will be motherboard manufacturer dependent. Full release BIOSes will be at a later date. When asked if the new 5000-series firmware for 400-series chipsets will remove support for older processors, AMD said it would be on a case-by-case basis depending on how the motherboard vendor wanted to enable support.

For users that purchase motherboards that do not have the required BIOS support for Ryzen 5000, the Processor Loan Boot Kit programme will still be available.

A Word on Sticker Shock

It is hard not to notice that AMD is raising the prices of its hardware for this new generation. The company believes that it is truly in a winning position, and that better hardware in the market deserves to be priced at a level that matches this. For any competitive business owner with a belief of a better product, finding that right balance of demand and price is always critical to how to manage sales and ultimately market share.

Anand once said a very insightful phrase to me. “There are no bad products, only bad prices.”

So with AMD asking for another $50 on these processors, is that a lot to ask?

AMD’s argument is that, for performance per dollar, it still retains a healthy lead over its competition in each market segment. The spokespersons were keen to point out that they still remember where AMD has come from to reach this level of performance, and understand that a metric such as performance per dollar has always been high on the list of requirements from its most passionate users. The difference this time around is that, because AMD is claiming it has the best performance on the market, it can now charge that slight premium but still offer a more compelling product.

The success of AMD’s Ryzen 3000 family is easy to see. It offers a very attractive performance per dollar proposition, and nine of the top ten processors on Amazon’s best sellers list are from AMD. Here’s that list, with the pricing as given in our buyer’s guide last week:

Price Options
[#] is Amazon Best-Seller Position
# AMD Price
[1] Ryzen 5 3600 $205
[2] Ryzen 7 3700XT $295
[3] Ryzen 5 3600X $209
[4] Ryzen 5 2600 $149
[5] Ryzen 9 3900X $430
[6] Ryzen 7 3800XT $340
[7] Ryzen 5 3600XT $230
[8] Ryzen 7 2700X $218
[9] Ryzen 3 3200G $100

This is an impressive list, however there a theme I have noticed. Starting from the top, the first four best-selling processors are below $299. The lowest Ryzen 5000-series processor in this launch comes in at the $299 price bracket. Out of that top nine, only #5 and #6 are above $299. This is a clear indication of where the bulk of the market is, especially as AMD is likely in increasing both market share and revenue.

In discussing the pricing with AMD, I noted that the new Ryzen 5000 processors are not only replacing hardware with a $50 higher MSRP, but also replacing hardware that routinely sells below MSRP. This makes the differences more akin to $90-$150. This of course changes some of the dynamic when we start discussing performance per dollar.

AMD’s response to this commentary was the one I would have given if I were in their position. The Ryzen 5000 series is a new product, and the claim of market leading performance means that the early adopters and AMD enthusiasts that want the best on day one will be able to get the hardware they desire. During the initial phase in almost all launches, users looking for the best bang-for-buck build will always look to purchasing the previous generation, which is almost always offered at a good discount as stock transfers to the latest product. AMD believes it has set the pricing of the new Zen 3 processors where it remains competitive, but still balances the message that AMD claims it has the best, most efficient processors.

What Now?

For users looking for processors under that $299 mark, or more offerings at the 65 W TDP, we expect AMD to look at expanding the Ryzen 5000 product list over the next six months. No exact word from AMD was given about what might come in the future. I even asked about Threadripper with Zen 3, but as expected there was no official comment.

As for the processors announced today, November 5th is the date to put in your diary. On this date, reviews will go live, details about the microarchitecture will be revealed, and processors will be available. We’re already pre-testing a LOT of hardware for our review. Let us know what comparisons matter most to you.

 
AMD Ryzen 5000 and Zen 3 on Nov 5th
POST A COMMENT

510 Comments

View All Comments

  • JfromImaginstuff - Friday, October 9, 2020 - link

    Now I wouldn't say dead, this same thing happened a few short years ago when AMD was king the last time. Not a fanboy but an observer here, the tide has ebbed and flowed between AMD and Intel, this has happened in the past and will happen again eventually Intel will take back the crown and then AMD will try to get it back....... so long as arm doesn't kill them both Reply
  • Spunjji - Friday, October 9, 2020 - link

    JfromImaginstuff is right here. Intel's core designs were clearly stronger than AMD's up until now - they just couldn't manufacture them with decent yields or power characteristics. Once they sort that out (and they seem to be making progress) we'll have actual competition again. But I'm very, very glad to see AMD making hay while the sun shines. Reply
  • ArcadeEngineer - Friday, October 9, 2020 - link

    Intel have already said that Rocket Lake-S is compatible with Z490 boards Reply
  • alexbhatti - Wednesday, October 14, 2020 - link

    When You will have to spend a considerable amount of money out of your pocket to purchase new swimwear. Hence, you are concerned about the returns that you are getting out of your swimwear. In fact, you expect them to last for a longer period. Therefore, we encourage you to go ahead and purchase Girls Australian Made Chlorine Tough Swimwear. They will be able to help you with saving a considerable amount of money in the long run.
    If you are still not convinced, go ahead, and look at all the benefits that you can experience. Then you will purchase such swimwear without thinking twice.
    ● They will not lose their shape
    Chlorine resistant girls’ bathers you purchase will never lose their shape. That is because they can control the impact created by chlorine and retain their good shape. You can always keep the swimwear in perfect condition. When you are getting such a perfect fit, you will not come across the need to spend more money and purchase new swimwear. This is one of the most prominent examples available to show how chlorine resistant girls racing swimwear can be cheap swimwear.
    ● Colors will not fade out
    At the time of purchasing girl’s swimwear, you often tend to go ahead with colorful options available in the market. Like, you do not expect colors offered out of swimwear to fade out along with time. However, chlorine can interact with the colors of your fabric. This will make the colors to fade away.
    As you can see, chlorine resistant swimwear will be able to deliver many benefits on your way. All these benefits will help you with saving a considerable amount of money. That is why you should not think twice before you purchase Chlorine resistant swimwear. Even if you must spend more money on buying them, you will be able to use them for an extended duration of time, which ensures the delivery of best returns out of your investment.

    https://www.novaswimwear.com/sale/
    Reply
  • alexbhatti - Wednesday, October 14, 2020 - link

    Pool water is always chlorinated with chemicals. Novaswimwear makes chlorine resistant swimwear for their swimmer customers such as mens swimwear Australia. Our products are totally Australian made swimwear. Rashies are common for sunburn but you also have to sit in the sun. We make womens to spend worry free moments under the sun.
    Now it is summer season. That means the weather is going to heat up. Finally the days to swim in the pool are imminent. Mens swimwear Australia helps men to protect from sun and UV rays. So they can have a lot of fun with water. Novaswimwear puts all efforts to design this chlorine resistant swimwear for their customers. These designs include jammer, brief and trunk. We have all ranges of sizes for every type of body. In this summer season, people want to take a quick dip in the pool. So the sun is on the top of your head. It can burn your skin. We want craft and design in addition to resistance from sunburn. Fabric- After taking a bath on the beach, if you are going home with wet bathers, it is not good for you or anybody. Search out for comfortable fabric. It has features that it can dry up quickly. It should have chlorine-resistance characteristics. It helps to keep swimsuits in good shape and color for longer periods of time.

    https://www.novaswimwear.com/girls/girls-sport-bac...
    Reply
  • peevee - Monday, October 19, 2020 - link

    "Good luck purchasing Intel's next gen CPUs knowing the die shrinkage issues they've had and openly discuss are ongoing AND will require switching (yet again... sigh) to a new socket"

    Good luck thinking that the NEXT AMD CPU will still remain on AM4.
    DDR5 will require new socket, coming out with the new range of CPUs to be sold in 2021 with DDR still is backwards. Everybody would be better off if AMD had indeed changed the socket for DDR5 compatibility earlier than later.
    Reply
  • Stu7nm3dflash - Thursday, October 8, 2020 - link

    Don’t feel too bad, you can still get a 4000 series APU, mini PC, I wish I waited and got one of those, less building, postage time, money, frustration. Put in some laptop RAM, PCIe 3 and SATA flash, from the same company, get express postage, to the newsagent. Wish I had, I’ll just have to wait, for the 5000 series APU’s, in the middle of next year. Reply
  • msroadkill612 - Friday, October 9, 2020 - link

    Yep - a $100 APU, 16GB, nvme... is a mighty little tank engine. Reply
  • Notagaintoday - Thursday, October 8, 2020 - link

    Your analysis is rather one sided, and maybe more than a little pro-Intel...

    You omit that to run the 10700K, you need a new motherboard, and you will need a Z class motherboard, thats $300 on top of the price you pay for your 10700K. For that additional $300, you'll get fewer PCI-e lanes, and they will be slower. So on the few Intel boards that will allow bifurcation of the PCE-e x16 slot, you'll have fewer SATA ports and fewer USB ports, and you won't be able to use PCI-e gen 4 storage...

    Also, you'll need a massive and v/ expensive cooler to deal with the 229 watts of heat the 10700K will produce when it turbos, or you can save money on that massive cooler, and the CPU will never boot to anywhere near its top speed, and you'll be playing games on a CPU thats slower than a AMD 3500 and be paying twice the price...

    Oh, and 100 watts extra on your electricity bill, always and forever! And if you have air-con, an additional 100 Watts to remove the heat from your room/home!
    Reply
  • Gio97BR - Thursday, October 8, 2020 - link

    I have a Ryzen PC, so for me a new morherboard wouldn't be required. But people making a Ryzen build from scratch would need a new motherboard anyway, and they will be getting no upgradeability since it's the last gen on AM4. AMD's new motherboards aren't also what I would call cheap, specially since they got PCI-E 4.0.

    The most appealing part of your argument would be about cooling Intel CPUs. But given that only the 5600X comes with a bundled cooler, the 5800X would give you such an expense as well.

    As a matter of fact, I think that the 5800X is the most oddly priced of these CPUs. If I ever go Zen 3, I will pay $100 more and get 4 more cores on the 5900X, which has the best price proposition.
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now