When I first heard about Razer, they were a company that strictly made gaming peripherals. I mostly associate them with their DeathAdder mouse, with the version from 2010 still being one of the best mice I've ever used. Razer has also made audio equipment like gaming headsets for quite some time, as well as a line of gaming keyboards. As time went on, some of these products gained features that were unique to Razer, such as the use of Razer-designed mechanical switches in their gaming keyboards, and RGB backlighting in various products with the Chroma branding.

Razer has made a number of attempts to move beyond the world of gaming peripherals. Some have been more successful than others. For example, some gamers may remember the Razer Edge Pro, the gaming tablet that never seemed to catch on with consumers. Razer also made a fitness band called the Nabu, but it also appears to have missed the mark and has seen some pretty heavy discounts in recent times. With Razer's recent purchase of NextBit, many have begun to speculate on whether Razer plans to move into the mobile industry.

While it would be fun to speculate on Razer's plans for the future, they do have one area beyond peripherals that has been an undisputed success. Their line of laptops, which started with the unveiling of the original Razer Blade in 2011, have shown that it's possible to build gaming laptops without the bulky plastic bodies and poor quality displays that traditionally characterized high-performance laptops from other vendors. As time has gone on, Razer has iterated on the original Razer Blade, and introduced both a smaller model in the form of the Razer Blade Stealth, a 14-inch model to carry on the name of the original 17-inch Razer Blade, and the Razer Blade Pro to fill the 17-inch space. That latter model is the laptop I'll be looking at today.

Prior to the launch of this new model in late 2016, the Razer Blade Pro was last updated in 2014. That model was put in an awkward position right from launch. It came with NVIDIA's GTX 860M GPU, which was actually a step down from the GTX 870M in the 14-inch Razer Blade that was updated around the same time. It also only used a 1080p display due to limitations in what 17.3-inch panels were available on the market, while the 14-inch Blade Pro clocked in at 3200x1800 despite being $100 cheaper. The headline feature of the 2014 Blade Pro was its SwitchBlade touchpad, but it again suffered from unenthusiastic reception in the market. Ultimately, the Blade Pro ended up being a more niche machine, which didn't really offer advantages compared to its little brother except for users who really needed such a large display regardless of resolution.

With the 2016 Blade Pro, Razer is changing up their strategy. When I think about gaming laptops, it seems to make sense to me that a larger model will have fewer power and thermal limitations, and so it should be even more powerful than the smaller versions. For example, a 13-inch MacBook Pro is less powerful than the 15-inch model. The 2016 Blade Pro follows that line of thinking, and pushes the performance of Razer's gaming laptops farther than ever before. I've outlined its specifications below.

2016 Razer Blade Pro
CPU Intel Core i7-6700HQ
2.6-3.5 GHz
6MB Cache
2560 CUDA Cores
1556 - 1733 (Boost) MHz
Memory 32 GB 2133MHz DDR4
Display 17.3" 3840x2160 60 Hz w/G-SYNC
Storage 512GB (2 x 256GB) M.2 PCIe SSD
1TB (2 x 512GB) M.2 PCIe SSD
2TB (2 x 1TB) M.2 PCIe SSD
I/O 3 x USB 3.0 Ports
1 x Thunderbolt 3
1 x HDMI 2.0
SD Card Slot
1 x Headset Jack
1 x Killer E2400 Ethernet (10/100/1000Mbps)
Dimensions 22.5mm x 424mm x 281mm (HxWxD)
0.88" x 16.7" x 11" (HxWxD)
Weight 3.54 kg / 7.8 lbs
Battery 99 Wh, 250W AC Adapter
Wireless Killer Wireless-AC 1535
2x2:2 with Bluetooth 4.1
Price $3699.99 512GB
$3999.99 1TB (Model tested)
$4499.99 2TB

As you can see, the Razer Blade Pro is quite the laptop. It's certainly not the bulky, heavy, tank-like device that you get when you buy a desktop replacement (DTR) from Clevo or MSI, but it doesn't compromise on performance in order to do so. Inside is NVIDIA's fastest GPU, the GTX 1080. There's also a pair of PCIe SSDs, Intel's i7-6700HQ CPU, 32GB of 2133MHz DDR4 memory, a UHD display with Adobe RGB color support, and an assortment of ports so you can connect all of your existing devices without issues. 

With all that power in a relatively thin and light chassis, it's not a surprise that the Blade Pro comes at such a high price. The 2014 Razer Blade Pro launched at a price of $2299, although it was lacking in the spec department in many ways, and the 14-inch Blade, with better hardware, was cheaper at $2199. Now that the Blade Pro sits at the top of Razer's laptop line for both size and performance, a price gap is actually justified. For the model with 512GB of internal storage, the Blade Pro costs 3699.99 USD. Moving to 1TB brings the price up to 3999.99 USD, and the 2TB model is the most expensive at 4499.99 USD.

As I mentioned before, the 2014 Blade Pro definitely had room for improvement. The 2016 Blade Pro also comes after two years of technological improvements, and it has great potential as both a gaming machine and a mobile workstation. To start things off I'll go over the Blade Pro's design, before moving on to performance testing.

Design, Keyboard and Trackpad
Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • sorten - Monday, March 6, 2017 - link

    I prefer plastic laptops to aluminum because I don't want to rest my wrists on a cold laptop in the morning. To each their own.
  • akdj - Tuesday, March 14, 2017 - link

    I could be completely wrong but I think I remember seeing a documentary on the building of the triple 7 and 787 (Boeing) and their carbon fiber testing, the results and a line I thought was interesting from one of the folks speaking was his comparison with the aluminum and titanium alloys we'd been using and perfecting... was something to the effect of 'carbon fiber while 'stronger' in some situations and better dealing with fatigue over time... it's not as 'tough' as the metals - in that tests of the fuselage and, I believe, a 'drop test' actually 'broke' the CF fuselage while denting the aluminum fuselage...a test simulated as a hard landing
    The findings were escaping from an aluminum fuselage was more survivable than the CF/composite airframe in the case of a post breakup fire (aluminum dented will keep the fire out while the carbon fiber breaking was an immediate entry for fire to the cabin and more fuel)
    Not that this has any relevance lol...but the cases you mentioned were also low weight situations (race and space) where 'break ups' are built to absorb energy or for atmospheres with no... atmosphere. Or 'pressures', winds, etc.
    Good stuff but metal laptops are just great!
  • DanNeely - Monday, March 6, 2017 - link

    With NVidia calling the current gen of laptop GPUs as being equal to the Desktop versions, I think you should include the desktop cards in the GPU result tables.
  • SkipPerk - Wednesday, April 19, 2017 - link

    You still have clock speed differences
  • zeeBomb - Monday, March 6, 2017 - link

    A laptop that I'll (probably) never get
  • zeeBomb - Monday, March 6, 2017 - link

    “Using two SSDs in RAID0 is not beneficial, but it does have many drawbacks.” ???

    Faulty paralleslm here?
  • Brandon Chester - Monday, March 6, 2017 - link

    Good catch. That sentence is a bit awkward. "Not beneficial" was meant to mean, not advantageous. I've reworded it.
  • zeeBomb - Monday, March 6, 2017 - link

    OK great. I guess my quick proof reading helped in class haha
  • Zan Lynx - Monday, March 6, 2017 - link

    The reviewer keeps harping on the CPU performance, but never acknowledges that a faster CPU would change the power and heat envelope, requiring a bigger power supply, more cooling and a bigger case.
  • Brandon Chester - Monday, March 6, 2017 - link

    The TDP of i7-6700HQ and i7-6920HQ are equivalent. I have it on good authority that 6920HQ would have worked perfectly well with no changes to the design of the laptop.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now