Huawei’s smartphone branding strategy seems similar to many car companies. Toyota, for example, has the Lexus marque for high-end, luxury vehicles and the Scion marque that develops sporty, lower-cost vehicles with customization options targeted at millennials. Vehicles that carry the Toyota brand target mainstream consumers, covering a broad swath of the market with many different products.

Huawei’s Mate and P-series phones are analogous to Toyota’s Lexus brand, catering to the high-end of the market with premium performance and features, with the P-series specifically focusing on design and photography. In addition to its many other phones with varying features and price points, Huawei’s Honor brand parallels Toyota’s Scion, focusing on always-connected millennials. According to Huawei, 80% of Honor “fans” are aged 18-34, and delivering the performance, features, and style this demographic craves, while keeping cost within reason, is a significant challenge for Huawei.

After several years of declining sales, Toyota announced that it will discontinue the Scion brand in 2017. As an e-brand that’s distributed online without Toyota’s marketing budget and network of dealer showrooms, will Huawei’s Honor brand suffer a similar fate? For now sales continue to climb, with 40 million Honor phones sold in 2015, twice as many as the previous year. But Honor faces new challenges as it expands into new territories, such as the crowded and saturated US market, where it has little brand recognition.

Huawei’s first foray into the US smartphone market was with the Honor 5X, a lower-cost device with a well-balanced design. Encouraged by its initial reception, Huawei is back with a new device for the US—the Honor 8. While the Honor 5X hits a lower $199 price point, the Honor 8 costs twice as much but significantly improves performance and features. In many ways, it’s a restyled, less-expensive version of Huawei’s P9.

For starters, both phones use 5.2-inch 1080p IPS LCD displays. They also share similar dimensions (the Honor 8 is just a tad thicker and heavier) and the same 3000 mAh battery. The camera setup is the same too, with an 8MP sensor up front and dual 12MP sensors (one color and one black and white) around back, which I’ll discuss more later in the review.

  Huawei Honor 8 Huawei Honor 7 Huawei P9
SoC HiSilicon Kirin 950

4x Cortex-A72 @ 2.3GHz
4x Cortex-A53 @ 1.8GHz
Mali-T880MP4 @ 900MHz
HiSilicon Kirin 935

4x Cortex-A53 @ 2.2GHz
4x Cortex-A53 @ 1.5GHz
HiSilicon Kirin 955

4x Cortex-A72 @ 2.5GHz
4x Cortex-A53 @ 1.8GHz
Mali-T880MP4 @ 900MHz
RAM 3GB / 4GB LPDDR4-2666 3GB LPDDR3-1600 3GB LPDDR3-1866
NAND 32GB / 64GB (eMMC)
+ microSD
16GB (eMMC)
+ microSD
32GB / 64GB (eMMC)
+ microSD
Display 5.2-inch 1920x1080
5.2-inch 1920x1080
5.2-inch 1920x1080
Dimensions 145.5 x 71.0 x 7.45 mm
153 grams
143.2 x 71.9 x 8.50 mm
157 grams
145.0 x 70.9 x 6.95 mm
144 grams
Modem HiSilicon Balong (Integrated)
2G / 3G / 4G LTE (Category 6)

HiSilicon Balong (Integrated)
2G / 3G / 4G LTE (Category 6)

HiSilicon Balong (Integrated)
2G / 3G / 4G LTE (Category 6)

SIM Size 2x NanoSIM (w/o microSD)
(dual standby)
2x NanoSIM (some models & w/o microSD)
(dual standby)
2x NanoSIM (some models & w/o microSD)
(dual standby)
Front Camera 8MP, 1.4μm, f/2.4 8MP, f/2.4, LED flash 8MP, 1.4μm, f/2.4
Rear Camera 2x 12MP (color + monochrome), 1/2.9” Sony IMX286 Exmor RS, 1.25µm pixels, f/2.2, Laser AF + depth, HDR, dual-tone LED flash 21MP, 1/2.4” Sony IMX230 Exmor RS, 1.12µm pixels, f/2.0, PDAF, HDR, dual-tone LED flash 2x 12MP (color + monochrome), 1/2.9” Sony IMX286 Exmor RS, 1.25µm pixels, f/2.2, Laser AF + depth, HDR, dual-tone LED flash
Battery 3000 mAh (11.46 Wh)
3100 mAh (11.78 Wh)
3000 mAh (11.46 Wh)
Connectivity 802.11a/b/g/n/ac, BT 4.2 LE, NFC, IrLED, GPS/GNSS, USB 2.0 Type-C 802.11a/b/g/n/ac, BT 4.1 LE, IrLED, GPS/GNSS, microUSB 2.0 802.11a/b/g/n/ac, BT 4.2 LE, NFC (EVA-L09 only), GPS/GNSS, USB 2.0 Type-C
Launch OS Android 6.0 with Emotion UI 4.1 Android 5.0 with Emotion UI 3.1 Android 6.0 with Emotion UI 4.1

Both phones come with either 32GB or 64GB of eMMC NAND for internal storage, which can be augmented with a microSD card. The Honor 8, like the Huawei Mate 8, does use a different SoC from the P9. The four ARM Cortex-A72 CPUs in its Kirin 950 SoC only reach 2.3GHz versus the 2.5GHz in the P9’s Kirin 955, but this will not make a big difference in day-to-day use. Rounding out the big.LITTLE arrangement in both SoCs are four Cortex-A53 CPUs running at up to 1.8GHz and a Mali-T880MP4 GPU at up to 900MHz. While the T880 is currently ARM’s flagship, using only four shader cores limits peak performance. For comparison, the international version of Samsung’s Galaxy S7 comes with a Mali-T880MP12 GPU with three times as many cores. The Honor 8 does make the jump to LPDDR4 RAM, although it’s unlikely this will improve performance because the Kirin 950 and its quad-core GPU are not bandwidth limited.

In our Mate 8 review, the Kirin 950 SoC scored well in both peak performance and efficiency, a result of HiSilicon’s excellent implementation of A72 CPU cores on TSMC’s 16nm FinFET+ process. HiSilicon claims that the Kirin 955 SoC in the Huawei P9 is even more power efficient than the 950, so it will be interesting to see how the Honor 8, with the same size battery and screen, compares in our battery life tests. Along with the efficient SoC, the Honor 8 also includes the i5 sensor hub that further reduces power consumption by offloading specialized tasks such as voice recognition, step calculation, and mp3 music decoding to its ARM Cortex-M7 processor.

Huawei also includes some software features for further stretching battery life. There are three different power modes—Performance, Smart, and Ultra—that adjust the CPU DVFS curves and tailor network usage. The Smart mode is selected by default and promises a sensible balance between performance and power. There’s also the ROG power saving mode that limits screen resolution to 720p, reducing the GPU’s workload and the amount of data transferred over the memory bus. The power firewall feature (off by default) detects “power-intensive” background apps and automatically closes them.

The Honor 8 comes with Bluetooth 4.2 LE and 2.4GHz/5GHz 802.11a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi courtesy of the Broadcom BCM4345 (the same solution found in the P9), but does not support 2x2 MU-MIMO like the Galaxy S7. It also comes with NFC, which is absent on all but one version of the P9, and an infrared LED for universal remote control duties, another feature missing from the P9. On the bottom is a USB 2.0 Type-C port for data transfer and fast charging.

Residing inside the Kirin 950 SoC is a HiSilicon Balong baseband processor supporting Category 6 LTE speeds—up to 300 Mb/s down and 50 Mb/s up with 2x20 MHz carrier aggregation and 64-QAM on the downlink.

Frequency Band Support
AT&T / T-Mobile
Mobile / Unicom
FDD-LTE B1 / B2 / B3 / B4 / B5 / B7 / B8 / B12 / B17 / B20 B1 / B3 / B4 / B7 B1 / B3 / B7 / B8
TDD-LTE - B38 / B39 / B40 / B41 B38 / B39 / B40 / B41
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
WCDMA B1 / B2 / B4 / B5 / B8 B1 / B2 / B4 / B5 / B8 B1 / B2 / B5 / B8
TD-CDMA - B34 / B39 B34 / B39

The version sold in the US works on AT&T’s and T-Mobile’s networks, and it also supports the necessary frequencies to work in Europe. The Chinese models include support for the requisite CDMA2000, TD-SCDMA, and TD-LTE frequencies used by the national carriers.

The Honor 8’s SIM tray holds one NanoSIM card and either a second NanoSIM or microSD card. When using two SIMS, it functions in Dual-SIM Standby mode with the second card (user selectable) supporting only GSM voice calls.

There’s two configurations available for sale in the US: The 4GB / 32GB version costs $400, and the 4GB / 64GB version costs $450. Both versions are available in black, white, blue, and gold colors from select online retailers. Chinese customers get a third, less-expensive option with 3GB of RAM and 32GB of storage for ¥1999 (~$300).

Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • s.yu - Thursday, October 13, 2016 - link

    And how many buyers are gonna go on and calibrate it? You need a Spyder for that?
  • tipoo - Thursday, October 13, 2016 - link

    Well, the OP3 launched with bad calibration, that was much improved with a software update. So if the screen is good and just the calibration is off, maybe they could do that.
  • mczak - Thursday, October 13, 2016 - link

    I am really wondering about the glass surfaces. Unlike the P9 and some other high-end Huawei phones, the Honor line doesn't use gorilla glass. Some reviewers saying it's just ordinary glass - which shouldn't be the case (reportedly it should use some glass from NEG), but I'm really wondering if scratch resistance is at least in the decent category...
  • Pino - Thursday, October 13, 2016 - link

    "It’s not perfect (I’ve yet to see a phone that is)"
    Why don't you give ZTE Axon 7 a shot?
  • Rocket321 - Thursday, October 13, 2016 - link

    I second this, I'd love to see an in depth Axon 7 review.
  • FlyBri - Thursday, October 13, 2016 - link

    I totally agree -- the fact they haven't done a review of the Axon 7 at all yet is a bit disturbing. Also, in this review, they mention competitors in the same price range such as the OnePlus 3, but fail to mention the Axon 7, which many could argue is a better phone.
  • tipoo - Friday, October 14, 2016 - link

    You're saying that would qualify as perfect? I don't know that much about it, but at a brief glance it looks like it has a perfectly unpredictable camera, for one
  • pedjache - Friday, October 14, 2016 - link

    You...cant be serious?
  • tipoo - Friday, October 14, 2016 - link

    About what? The OPs comment was if you're looking for a perfect phone, look at the Axon 7, yet in a brief look at reviews I already found sluggish camera performance and UI freezing issues with it...Good despite that? Sure, I guess. But "perfect"? *That* can't be serious.
  • melgross - Thursday, October 13, 2016 - link

    I'd just like to make it clear that Leica doesn't make the lenses for the P9, nor did they design them. Leica itself has made that clear. What Leica has said about that was that they approved the lens designs, and did some basic tests of the camera, giving it their approval.

    What this means is unclear, because the cameras are ok, but nothing special. My feeling is that it isn't much more than marketing. Leica gets paid a small amount, and Huawai gets to stamp Leica on its phones.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now